Long
Reach and the Thomas Lightfoot Inn
By Robin Van Auken
Historic preservation is an admirable, though difficult,
goal to obtain. Preservation works best in communities that
have programs managed at the local government level.
In 2003, Williamsport's City Council considered an amendment
to a zoning ordinance that would result in new historic
preservation sections within the city; it also would regulate
and protect properties outside the Historic District. The
ordinance, however, did not pass, and consequently, historic
property has been lost to commercial development. One such
piece of property is the Thomas Lightfoot Inn, once a colonial-era
farmstead.
In April 2004, Sandra Rife of the Lycoming County Historical
Society contacted Lycoming College's archaeology department,
requesting a cultural resource management survey at 2887
South Reach Road, Williamsport, PA, the site of the inn.
The landowner, Bernard D. Rell, purchased the property in
2003 after a 2002 fire destroyed the historic structure.
Rell planned to build self-storage units on large concrete
slabs. He hired a contractor to clear and grade the land,
a gentle slope filled with 200-year-old trees, winding brick
paths and historic debris.
Reach Road neighbor and activist Alden Seitzer protested
Rell's plans to develop the area for a commercial enterprise.
For several months, Seitzer lobbied the City of Williamsport
to deny Rell building permits and to protect the historic
site. Encouraged by another neighbor who lives in the only
remaining structure of the Long Reach farm, a log granary
(ca. 1788), Seitzer contacted city and state officials,
non-profit historical preservation organizations, and the
media. He contended that, based upon a 1936 archaeological
excavation by Harry L. Schoff of the Works Progress Administration,
the site was historically significant and contained Native
American graves. Schoff recovered five historic burials
that he identified as Indian, as well as numerous artifacts.
Schoff concluded that the skeletons were not remnants of
an Indian village based upon the associated artifacts. He
proposed that they "could have been members of a raiding
party against the settlers and were worsted in the fight."
Derek (a.k.a. Derrick) Updegraff purchased Long Reach in
1788. His brother, Thomas Updegraff, settled the land in
1789. Thomas arrived at Long Reach with only twenty-five
cents, a wife and two children. He immediately began working,
trading leather for iron and selling both. Around 1792,
the original log homestead burned, and Thomas built a new,
larger home approximately 240 feet west of the old one.
His plantation eventually included a barn (said to be the
largest in the area), a smokehouse, a springhouse and a
granary, which still stands.
According to eyewitness accounts, the new Long Reach homestead
contained two historic tunnels that connected the farm and
the granary with the West Branch Canal, built in the 1830s.
The Updegraffs used the tunnels to transport products from
the canal boats to the farm.
As they were abolitionists and Quakers, the family also
used the tunnels to shuttle runaway slaves to freedom along
the Underground Railroad. In the documentary film, "Follow
the North Star to Freedom," viewers see a tunnel leading
away from the house through the basement. Former owners
have said that there was a three-foot-tall void between
the second and third floors. A common belief is that runaway
slaves hid there. Other histories report that the Updegraffs
hid slaves in the smokehouse, springhouse and other outbuildings.
In a memoir about his father, "The Life of Thomas Updegraff,"
Abraham Updegraff writes, "Father was for many years
the agent at this station of the U.G.R.R., and as this railroad
failed to make annual reports, we shall add a short description
of its workings. Although there has (sic) been several very
narrow escapes, this station never lost a passenger. No
slave was ever reclaimed after once reaching here by this
route."
Thomas Updegraff also accommodated canal travelers, converting
his home into an inn. The inn had ten rooms, five bathrooms
and a kitchen. The granary served as a stable for the packet
boat mules.
The Updegraffs also owned a schoolhouse west of the property.
According to a Williamsport Sun report on June 4, 1954,
many "Indian arrowheads and cooking utensils have been
found around the school house."
In December 1936, Works Progress Administration archaeologist
Harry L. Schoff excavated five historic period Native American
burials on the property near the foundation for the schoolhouse.
Schoff observed trace amounts of wood and nails in the soil,
which led him to speculate that that the bodies were buried
in wooden boxes. Along with the skeletal remains, Schoff
found metal objects and beads, bringing him to the conclusion
that the Native Americans were contact period and probably
Shawnee.
In 1936, Laura Updegraff died. Upon her death, Mr. H. Merill
Winner bought out the remaining heirs acquiring their property
(232 acres compared to the original 313). His wife, the
former Kathryn Bennett, was a descendant of the original
Updegraff family. During the period that Winner owned the
property, he had the front porch and the second story shutters
removed. The original barn burned during the 1920s; in 1939,
it was rebuilt east of the original spot. Winner also built
a five-car garage.
In 1954, Winner sold the property to Nelson U. Phillips
of Boston. This event marked the first time in its 162-year
history that a member of the Updegraff family did not own
the property known as “Long Reach.” Phillips
then sold the land to Charles Bidelespacher, who parceled
the land into river lots and industrial development. The
farmhouse, now a rental property, fell into disrepair.
In 1986, James and Rita Chilson purchased the property.
The Chilsons were aware of the property's historical significance,
and invested thousands of dollars in restoring it as a bed
and breakfast. The Chilsons named the house the “Thomas
Lightfoot Inn” after the man who initially surveyed
the land. In 1989, the Chilsons applied to the National
Historical register to have the property listed. They were
denied because of modern renovations.
In 1997, the Chilsons sold the property to Michael Chelentis,
who in turn sold his interest in 1999 to Alex and Donna
Kadenas. The Thomas Lightfoot Inn struggled economically
until January 2002, when a late-night fire gutted the structure.
Rell purchased the property in 2003 and applied for permits
to begin construction of storage units.
In August 2003, Jean Cutler, director of the Bureau for
Historic Preservation of the Pennsylvania Historical and
Museum Commission, contacted the City of Williamsport about
the planned construction. The purpose of her communication,
she outlined, "is to inform you that significant cultural
resources are located on this site which may be eligible
for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places.
The Updegraff Site will contribute significant information
to our knowledge of the history of Lycoming County, the
early development of Pennsylvania, and the role of Williamsport
in the abolitionist movement."
She concluded, "We hope that the Planning Commission
can work with the developer so that these resources can
be avoided."
In addition to the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission,
the Indian Country Today news service, the Lenape Nation
of Pennsylvania and the Nation Underground Railroad Freedom
association all sent letters urging the City of Williamsport
and other officials to prevent destruction of the site.
In response, Williamsport's City Council imposed a 90-day
moratorium during which the city codes staff had the power
to deny building and demolition permits for properties that
may have historic significance. The council reviewed the
city-zoning ordinance in fall 2003, considering a revision
to benefit historic preservation. It also would regulate
and protect properties outside the Historic District. However,
as noted earlier, the council decided not to alter the zoning
ordinance and granted building permits to the contractor.
In March 2004, City Engineer John J. Grado contacted Rell,
requesting that he consent to three requests made by the
City Council on behalf of the Lycoming County Historical
Society. The Historical Society wanted access to the property
to scan the site to detect subsurface voids or tunnels.
It also requested that Lycoming College's archaeological
department be allowed to excavate a series of test pits
as part of an abbreviated investigation, and that a local
archaeologist be allowed on the property during commercial
excavation to observe and document any historical evidence
uncovered.
Rell agreed, and, on April 17, 2004, members of the historical
society and local archaeologists mapped and remotely scanned
the site.
In May, Lycoming College students created a research design
and conducted a week-long cultural resource management project.
The purpose of their project was twofold: The City of Williamsport
requested an archaeological investigation of the property
to recover and record artifacts of prehistoric and historic
significance and report its findings to the Historical Society
for future scholarship; and to respond to the public demand
for action prior to destruction of a cultural landmark.
Many of the area's residents have celebrated birthdays,
weddings, anniversaries and other special occasions at the
historic Thomas Lightfoot Inn. They mourned the loss of
this nostalgic and beloved attraction. Lycoming College's
research, well documented by the mass media (newspapers,
radio and television), and subsequent report is intended
to provide solace and closure to people concerned about
the former Long Reach farm and popular tavern.
Survey and Excavation at Long Reach, Thomas
Lightfoot Inn
On April 17, 2004, members and staff of the Lycoming County
Historical Society met with archaeologist William Lowthert
of R. Christopher Goodwin and Associates, Inc. (Frederick,
Md.) at the Long Reach property. A geophysical remote sensing
expert, Lowthert had volunteered his services to benefit
the historical society. Using a conductivity meter, Lowthert
scanned a portion of the property at 2778 South Reach Road.
According to his subsequent report, earth conductivity and
magnetic susceptibility surveys were undertaken within a
70 x 40 meter (229.7 x 13.2 ft) area that society members
indicated might be historically significant.
Prior to the geophysical investigations, archaeologists
used a 50-meter surveyor tape and a compass to establish
a grid within the project area. Remote sensing lanes were
spaced at 1 m (3.28 ft) intervals. Lowthert took readings
every .5 m (1.64 ft) along these lanes.
According to Lowthert's report, the survey identified a
series of anomalies characteristic of structural remains
at other historic period sites. Strong signals along the
western edge of the survey area represented the Lightfoot
Inn footprint.
Other anomalies were associated with an old road or gravel
path, a brick path, and small outbuildings such as privies
or a kitchen midden. No patterning could be identified within
these anomalies, Lowthert reports, to suggest concentrated
prehistoric burials, although a few subtle anomalies in
the southeast portion of the survey area could have been
related to prehistoric features.
Remote sensing did not detect the tunnel because it is probably
located outside of the area designated for survey. A long-time
employee of a commercial business west of the property verified
the existence of a tunnel. He told archaeologists that he
had been inside the basement and in the entrance of the
tunnel during the 1990s before James Chilson sold the property.
He said the tunnel would have been at the west-northwest
side of the Lightfoot Inn structure, which fell outside
of Lowthert's survey area. The Rev. Dr. John Piper, dean
of admissions at Lycoming College and a published historian,
supported this claim. Piper said he had been in the basement
of the Lightfoot Inn and had seen the tunnel.
Karen Frock, documentary filmmaker and author of the Emmy-nominated
"Follow the North Star to Freedom," said that
she shot professional video of the doorway in the wall at
the invitation of Mary Elizabeth Winner Stockwell, a direct
descendant of Abraham Updegraff. Stockwell lived in the
house until it was sold out of the family. She remembers
a tunnel in the basement, and, in a 1993 interview with
Frock, described it as leading to a smokehouse. It had been
walled off several feet inside the doorway to make a room-sized
place, with the modern blocks clearly differing from the
rest of the construction.
On May 7, 2004, Lycoming College archaeologist Robin Van
Auken visited the Thomas Lightfoot Inn site and spoke with
Toby Edwards of J.F. Chenault Construction. Edwards reported
that he had been working at the site all morning with crawler
dozer removing tree stumps, concrete foundations and brick
pathways, leaving in his wake "basements" or craters
that may have reached depths of more than 18 inches. Unaware
of the impending archaeological investigation, he had removed
many of the pin flags placed by Lowthert. None of the previously
mapped features still existed.
Daniel Vassallo of Vassallo Engineering and Surveying, Inc.,
a Williamsport-based firm, provided Van Auken with a new
survey map, minus Rell's land-use design.
On May 10, Van Auken and the Lycoming College archaeology
crew visited the Thomas Lightfoot Inn site. Again, contractors
were dozing topsoil, and excavating tree stumps, concrete,
bricks and artifacts, piling them into small hills along
the northwest boundary of the property. The archaeology
investigation was slated to begin May 12, but much of the
site had already been destroyed. Rell's contractors agreed
to temporarily halt work so that the archaeology crew would
have several uninterrupted days at the site.
On May 12, the Lycoming College archaeology crew, consisting
of instructor Van Auken, Michelle Burns, Yvette Andrews,
Megan Hall, Erin Hocker, Matthew Stackhouse and Eryn Woleslagle,
reported to the Thomas Lightfoot Inn site. The crew re-mapped
the site using two of Lowthert's original pin flags. The
crew used a systematic survey of 50 x 50-65 cm test pits
spaced 30 feet (9.144 m). Working in pairs, the students
dug 18 test pits in varying soil conditions – some
with sand, gravel or hard clay. Finds included a prehistoric
side-notched net sinker, historic pottery, brick, nails,
wire, soil, glass shards, a coin (1838 U.S. one cent), and
bone.
The contractors unearthed the bone while removing a tree
stump. At the request of city engineer John Grado, archaeologists
were to report any potential human remains to the Williamsport
Police and the county coroner. The bone appeared to be the
top of a femur, but it was unclear to the crew if the bone
were human. Van Auken sent the bone to Dr. Pamela Harrington
of Cornerstone Family Health Center, Williamsport, for a
professional opinion. Harrington could not rule out the
possibility the bone was human. Next, orthopedic surgeon
Dr. Tom Connelly of Susquehanna Health Systems examined
the bone. He and a colleague both said the bone could be
human, but they were unsure. Van Auken sent the bone to
the county coroner. In all, the coroner, several orthopedic
surgeons, physicians, anatomists, veterinarians, and even
butchers, assessed the bone. Despite conflicting opinions,
the consensus was that the bones were most likely of a "large
mammal," but probably not human.
On May 13, the archaeology crew returned to the site and
recovered more historic and several diagnostic prehistoric
artifacts. It was concluded that the prehistoric artifacts
(an Archaic projectile point, a drill, and a net sinker)
were not in situ and may have been part of dirt fill carted
in from the banks of the river nearly two centuries before.
The crew expanded Test Pit 21 where the bone had been founded
the previous day. More bone fragments were recovered 12
inches below the surface.
On May 14, the crew returned to Test Pit 21 widening the
unit to 5' x 5', digging arbitrary levels of 10 inches by
quadrants. More historic artifacts, including a clay pipe
stem and several bowl fragments, were recovered in the north-center
of the unit about 10 inches from the surface. A Late Archaic
chert projectile point (Genessee, 5000-3500 YA), was found
in the northeast quadrant near the surface.
The crew also expanded Test Pit 34, which yielded the prehistoric
net sinker, into a 5' x 5' excavation unit. At a depth of
five inches in the northeast quadrant, two animal teeth
(one incisor and one molar) were found.
On May 15, archaeologists put in six shovel test pits at
the east end of the property in an attempt to locate evidence
of the original Updegraff log cabin. The contractors had
not yet disturbed the area. The first two test pits, UH1
and UH2, reached 50 cm with few cultural remains found.
In UH3, a five cm level of freshwater mussel shells and
charcoal was found at a depth of 60 cm. Beneath the charcoal
layer was an orange clay/sand matrix. In this clay/sand
matrix in UH3, archaeologists recovered a rusted metal door
pull, fragments of glass and indeterminate metal and some
stone. At a depth of 85 cm, the crew struck a large, flat
stone.
In UH4, 6 meters east of UH3, the charcoal and shell appeared
at 46 cm, however, there was less shell and charcoal. The
crew encountered the same large, flat stone at the bottom
of the test pit, a depth of 51 cm, and again, it covered
the bottom of this test pit. It is possible that the stone
had supported the original log structure, or may have been
a stone floor.
UH5 yield no artifacts except for a bit of charcoal at 50
cm and a layer of grey ash with mussel shells at 65 cm.
The pit depth measured 70 cm.
Test Pit UH6 was similar to the other pits; at 51 cm, several
smaller flat rocks were recovered, then at 60 cm the edge
of the large flat rock. Small amounts of charcoal and freshwater
mussels were recovered.
On May 17, the archaeology crew returned to the site to
complete and close the two expanded test pits, 21 and 34.
In 21, historic pottery, indeterminate metal fragments,
and another piece of a clay pipe bowl were recovered. The
stratigraphy was mottled; the soil was orange-brown with
black leaching. There was much disturbance and grass was
found in the north part of the unit at a depth of 40 cm.
It was conjectured that the contractor, while removing a
tree stump, had disturbed the entire unit.
Conclusion
The historic property of the Long Reach, one of the oldest
farmsteads in Williamsport and possibly Lycoming County,
has been impacted by destruction and construction for more
than 60 years, beginning with the building of the dike along
the West Branch of the Susquehanna River.
All of its original buildings have either burned, been dismantled
or collapsed because of decay, with one exception –
the log granary presently owned by Anna Kramer. Before the
property at 2728 Reach Road was destroyed, archaeologists
were able to map some of its original features and were
able to collect a sample of historic and prehistoric artifacts.
These artifacts are important in the telling of a colonial
family's struggle from poverty to prosperity.
Thomas Updegraff and his family probably built their original
log structure directly north of the existent log granary.
In the early 1800s, this structure burned. Whether it was
intentional is unknown. Only a few historic artifacts were
found in the ash layer, approximately 50 cm below the surface
level. This may be an indication that the fire was planned
and the Updegraff's personal property had been removed from
the structure before it burned. The soil was then "sweetened"
by the addition of freshwater mussels, a rich source of
calcium and nitrogen for growing crops.
The Updegraffs mounded the farmstead to the west to protect
their property from the seasonal floods, bringing in wagonloads
of soil from along the nearby riverbank, a matrix also rich
in nutrients. A stone wall wrapped around the Updegraff's
new house, and a slate step led to the front entrance. A
row of hardwood trees completed the avenue. Later, they
added a brick walkway, winding through the property, possibly
from small gardens to various outbuildings.
When the Updegraffs built an addition to the home, once
again soil from the river was brought in by wagons and piled
up along east side of the stone wall. The land was leveled
with the top of the wall, approximately three feet high.
Prehistoric Indian artifacts – a late Archaic point,
a drill, a net sinker and several chert flakes – were
probably transported to the site in this matrix. This may
be the reason why no other Indian artifacts were recovered
(when one netsinker is found, others should be nearby).
In addition, the lack of Indian pottery, the presence of
the Genessee Late Archaic point and the netsinker and the
drill (which are not diagnostic) indicate that the soil
that the Updegraffs used to mound the homestead probably
came from an Archaic Indian site along the river.
Historians know that the Updegraffs and their heirs lived
at Long Reach from 1788 throughout the mid-1900s. The historic
artifacts recovered verify occupation of the farm from the
late 1700s to the late 1800s. Among the most significant,
datable artifacts were an 1838 coin (minted at the height
of the Canal Period), white ironstone china sherds (mid-late
19th century), blue transfer ware sherds (late 19th century),
brown stoneware sherds, cut nails (ca. 1820-1900) and pane
glass.
Although archaeologists hoped to find evidence of the house
foundation and tunnels, contractors had already removed
all foundational material, tree stumps and features. The
artifacts recovered were primarily middle- to late-19th
century farm and home materials.
The archaeological investigation of the property purchased
by Bernard Rell was limited in scope and resources. Archaeologists
had less than five days to dig test pits and expand the
units that yielded significant material. The artifacts recovered
and features revealed during the investigation support the
historic record of colonial occupation and a steady improvement
of the property during the Updegraff's ownership. Although
the original homestead has been destroyed, one historic
structure remains – the log granary. According to
its owner, heavy traffic along Reach Road negatively affects
the small log structure. The recommended preservation plan
by the City of Williamsport is imperative. The structure
should be removed and preserved as a legacy of pioneer days
in Lycoming County.
Works Consulted
Baldia, Maximilian O. 2004. The Paleo-Indian Period. 28
August 2000, Rev. 20 April 2004. http://www.comp-archaeology.org/USPaleo-Indian.htm
6/01/04
Bergman, Christopher, Doershuk, John, Moeller, Roger, LaPorta,
Philip, and Schuldrenrein, Joseph. 1998. An Introduction
to the Early and Middle Archaic Occupations at Sandts Eddy.
In: Raber, Paul A, Miller, Patricia E., Neusius, Sarah M.,
eds. The Archaic Period in Pennsylvania: Hunter-gatherers
of the Early and Middle Holocene Period. (Recent Research
in Pennsylvania Archaeology No. 1). Harrisburg, Pa.: Pennsylvania
Historical and Museum Commission. Pp. 45-76.
Bressler, James P. 1989. Prehistoric Man on Canfield Island:
(36LY37) Lycoming County, Pennsylvania. Williamsport, Pa.:
Presto Print.
Bressler, James P. and Rainey, Harry D. 2003. Excavation
of the Snyder Site (36LY287). Williamsport, Pa.: North Central
Chapter No. 8, Society for Pennsylvania Archaeology and
Lycoming County Historical Society.
Bressler, James P. and Rockey, Karen. 1997. Tracking the
Shenks Ferry Indians at the Ault Site (36LY120). Montoursville,
Pa.: Paulhamus Litho, Inc.
Carr, Kurt W. 1998. Archaeological Site Distributions and
Patterns of Lithic Utilization During the Middle Archaic
in Pennsylvania. In: Raber, Paul A, Miller, Patricia E.,
Neusius, Sarah M., eds. The Archaic Period in Pennsylvania:
Hunter-gatherers of the Early and Middle Holocene Period.
(Recent Research in Pennsylvania Archaeology No. 1). Harrisburg,
Pa.: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission. Pp.
77-90.
Carr, K.W. and Adovasio, J.M. 2002. Paleoindians in Pennsylvania.
In: Carr, Kurt W. and Adovasio, James M., eds. Ice Age Peoples
of Pennsylvania. (Recent Research in Pennsylvania Archaeology
No. 2). Harrisburg, Pa.: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum
Commission, pp. 1-50.
Gardner, W. M. 1989. An Examination of Cultural Change
in the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene (ca. 9200 to
6800 BC). In: Wittkofski, J.M. and Reinhart, T. R., eds.
Paleoindian Research in Virginia: A Synthesis. (Special
Publication No. 19. Archaeological Society of Virginia.)
Pp. 5-51.
Kelly, Kim M. 1996. The Dalton Gang. Indian Artifact Magazine.
Vol. 15-1, Jan/Feb/Mar 1996: 16-17.
Miller, Patricia E. 1998. Lithic Projectile Point Tehcnology
and Raw Material Use in the Susquehanna River Valley. In:
Raber, Paul A, Miller, Patricia E., Neusius, Sarah M., eds.
1998. The Archaic Period in Pennsylvania: Hunter-gatherers
of the Early and Middle Holocene Period. (Recent Research
in Pennsylvania Archaeology No. 1). Harrisburg, Pa.: Pennsylvania
Historical and Museum Commission. Pp. 91-120.
Raber, Paul A, Miller, Patricia E., Neusius, Sarah M. 1998.
The Archaic Period in Pennsylvania: Current Models and Future
Directions. In: Raber, Paul A, Miller, Patricia E., Neusius,
Sarah M., eds. The Archaic Period in Pennsylvania: Hunter-gatherers
of the Early and Middle Holocene Period. (Recent Research
in Pennsylvania Archaeology No. 1). Harrisburg, Pa.: Pennsylvania
Historical and Museum Commission. Pp. 121-137.
Stewart, R. Michael. 1994. Prehistoric Farmers of the Susquehanna
Valley: Clemson Island Culture and the St. Anthony Site.
(Occasional Publications in Northeastern Anthropology, No.
13). Bethlehem, Conn.: Archaeological Services.
Turnbaugh, William A. 1975. Man, Land, and Time: The Cultural
Prehistory and Demographic Patterns of North-Central Pennsylvania.
Evansville, Ind.: Unigraphic, Inc.
Wallace, Paul A.W. 1999. Indians in Pennsylvania. (Anthropological
Series No. 5). 2nd ed. Rev. by William A. Hunter. Harrisburg,
Penna.: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission.